Studia Kinanthropologica 2016, 17(2):131-138

The use of GPS devices to monitor physical activity - potential and limits

M. Vorlíček1,*, L. Rubín2, J. Dygrýn2, J. Mitáš, V. Voženílek2
1 Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Physical Culture
2 Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Science

Physical activity (PA) is one of the factors that positively affect health. Recent studies confirm that the type of the built environment can influence the physical activity behaviour. This relationship can be examined by a variety of methods (questionnaires, pedometers and accelerometers). At present, use of geographic information systems (GIS) and satellite positioning systems such as the global positioning system (GPS) appears to be very appropriate. Using GPS devices can locate PA in space and time. This information can help us understand the issue of active lifestyle. The main objective of this study is to clarify the use of GPS technology for PA monitoring in the Czech Republic. PA monitoring using GPS devices was conducted in Olomouc in 2014. One-week measurement was performed by 160 students (63 boys) from three primary schools. PA intensity was monitored by ActiGraph GT3X and localized by GPS logger Holux RCV - 3000. The combination of data from the accelerometer and GPS logger allows us to predict more easily where and at what intensity level the participants were active. Data imported into GIS can be analyzed and compared with the type of environment. We can easily estimate the influence of environmental elements such as parks or bike paths to the structure of participants' PA. The use of GPS devices can very effectively contribute to the localization of PA and facilitate formulation of recommendations to promote PA in municipal practice. Such recommendations can be helpful in improving health of the population. However, usage of these devices in practice has many restrictions such as inaccuracy, battery capacity, slow first satellite connection and negative participants' attitude towards this type of research.

Keywords: environment; GIS; health; PALMS; PA localization

Published: September 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vorlíček M, Rubín L, Dygrýn J, Mitáš J, Voženílek V. The use of GPS devices to monitor physical activity - potential and limits. Studia Kinanthropologica. 2016;17(2):131-138.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bauman, A., Bull, F., Chey, T., Craig, C. L., Ainsworth, B. E., Sallis, J. F. et al. (2009). The international prevalence study on physical activity: results from 20 countries. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6 (21). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Caspersen, C. J., Powell, K. E., & Christenson, G. M. (1985). Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports, 100 (2), 126-131.
    3. Cooper, A. R., Page A.S., Wheeler B.W., Hillsdon M., Griew P., & Jago R. (2010). Patterns of GPS measured time outdoors after school and objective physical activity in English children: the PEACH project. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7 (31). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Duncan, J. S., Oliver, M., & MacRae, D. (2011). Positional accuracy of seven portable GPS receivers under a variety of environmental conditions. In Active Living Research Annual Conference; Feb 22-24; San Diego CA; www.activelivingresearch.org/node/12191.
    5. Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28 (2), 117-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Humpel, N., Owen, N., & Leslie, E. (2002). Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22 (3), 188-199. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Jones, A. P., Coombes, E. G., Griffin, S. J., & van Sluijs, E. M. (2009). Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using Global Positioning Systems. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6 (42). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Jun, J., Guensler, R., & Ogle, J. (2007). Smoothing methods to minimize impact of global positioning system random error on travel distance, speed, and acceleration profile estimates. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1972), 141-150. Go to original source...
    9. Kerr, J., Duncan, S., & Schipperijn, J. (2011). Using global positioning system in health research: a practical approach to data collection and processing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41 (5), 532-540. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Krenn, P. J., Mag, D. I., Titze, S., Oja, P., Jones, A., & Ogilvie, D. (2011) Use of global positioning systems to study physical activity and the environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41 (5), 508-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. McCormack, G. R., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2008). The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors. Preventive Medicine, 46 (1), 33-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Mitáš, J., Dygrýn, J., & Frömel, K. (2008). Využití geografických informačních systémů při sledování ukazatelů pohybové aktivity. Česká kinantropologie, 12 (4), 21-29.
    13. Morse, D. T. (1999). MINSIZE2: A computer program for determining effect size and minimum sample size for statistical significance for univariate, multivariate and nonparametric tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 (3), 518-531. Go to original source...
    14. Oliver, M., Badland, H., Mavoa S., Duncan, M. J., & Duncan S. (2010). Combining GPS, GIS, and accelerometry: Methodological issues in the assessment of location and intensity of travel behaviors. Journal of physical activity & health, 7 (1), 102-108. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. PALMS. (2014). Dostupné 28. duben 2016, z http://www.ucsd-palms-project.wikispaces.com.
    16. Quigg, R., Gray, A., Reeder, AI., Holt, A., & Waters, D. L. (2010). Using accelerometers and GPS units to identify the proportion of daily physical activity located in parks with playgrounds in New Zealand children. Preventive Medicine, 50 (5), 235-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Rodriguez, D. A., Brown, A. L., & Troped, P. J. (2005). Portable global positioning units to complement accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37 (11), 572-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93 (9), 1552-1558. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Sallis, J., Bauman, A., & Pratt, M. (1998). Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15 (4), 379-397. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Townshend, A. D., Worringham, C. J., & Stewart, I. B. (2008). Assessment of speed and position during human locomotion using nondifferential GPS. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40 (1), 124-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Troped, P. J., Wilson, J. S., Matthews, C. E., Cromley, E. K., & Melly, S. J. (2010). The built environment and location-based physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38 (4), 429-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Van Dyck, D., Deforche, B., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2009). Neighbourhood walkability and its particular importance for adults with a preference for passive transport. Health & Place, 15 (2), 496-504. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). Dostupné 15. duben 2016, z http://www.who.int/topics/physicalactivity/en/.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content