Studia Kinanthropologica 2019, 20(3):225-229

Hitting balls from a pitching machine and pitcher in softball: case study

J. Carboch*, P. Šmejkalová
Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta tělesné výchovy a sportu

If a player faces a pitching machine, he/she cannot see some important cues before the ball release, which are available if the player hits the balls delivered from a pitcher. The aim is to find, if hitting balls delivered from a pitching machine or a pitcher affect the players swing timing in softball. This is a case study. The subject hit balls delivered from a pitcher and pitching machine. This action was recorded by a high-speed video camera (200 fps). The swing timing was significantly different in specific phases of the swing. The subject initiated her movement 0,24 s earlier when she faced the pitcher compared to the pitching machine (d = -0,90). T-tests revealed significant difference (p < 0,05) in the backswing and forward swing duration in the pitcher and pitching machine conditions. These differences show change in swing timing, which can affect he movement coordination. Because this is a case study, we can't generalize the results, but coaches should be aware about these issues.

Keywords: anticipation; visual perception; game performance; kinematic analyses

Published: September 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Carboch J, Šmejkalová P. Hitting balls from a pitching machine and pitcher in softball: case study. Studia Kinanthropologica. 2019;20(3):225-229.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 353-357. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Passos, P. (2007). Ecological validity, repre-sentative design and correspondence between experimental task constraints and behavioural settings. Ecological Psychology, 19, 69-78. Go to original source...
    3. Balkó, Š., Heidler, J., & Jelínek, M. (2018). Relationship between the armed arm's motor response and muscle activation time during the lunge in fencers of varied ability. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 13 (1), 50-59. Go to original source...
    4. Bartlett, R. M. (2003). The science and medicine of cricket: an overview and update. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 733-752. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Carboch, J., Süss, V., & Kočíb, T. (2014). Ball Machine Usage in Tennis: Movement Initiation and Swing Timing While Returning Balls from a Ball Machine and from a Real Server. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 13, 304-308.
    6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
    7. Flyger N., Button, C., & Rishijar, N. (2006). The science of softbal; implications for performance and injury prevention. Sports Medicine, 36 (9), 797-816. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Goulet, C., Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (1989). Expertise differences in preparing to return a tennis serve: A visual information processing approach. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 382-398. Go to original source...
    9. Jacobs, D. M., & Michaels, C. F. (2002). On the paradox of learning and paradigm. Ecological Psychology, 14, 127-140. Go to original source...
    10. Pinder, R. A., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2009). Information-movement coupling in developing cricketers under changing ecological practice constraints. Human Movement Science, 28 (4), 468-479. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Pinder, R. A., Renshaw, I., Davids, K., & Kerherve, H. (2011). Principles for the use of ball projection machines in elite and developmental sport programmes. Sports Medicine, 41 (10), 793-800. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Pravečková P., Matošková P., Süss V., & Aubrecht I. (2017). Differences in the timing of baseball swing in different conditions for hitting of elite baseball players in the Czech Republic. In M. Zvonař & Z. Sajdlová (Eds.). 11th International Conference On Kinanthropology; Sport And Quality Of Life (pp. 97-106). Brno.
    13. Renshaw, I., Oldham, A. R. Davids, K. W., & Golds, T. (2007). Changing ecological constraints of practice alters coordination of dy-namic interceptive actions. European Journal of Sport Science, 7 (3), 157-167. Go to original source...
    14. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Motor learning and performance; From priciples to practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign.
    15. Shim, J., Carlton, L. G., & Kwon, Y. (2006). Perception of kinematic characteristics of tennis strokes for anticipating stroke type and direction. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 326-339. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Shim, J., Miller, G., & Lutz, R. (2005). Visual cues and information used to anticipate tennis ball shot and placement. Journal of Sport Behavior, 28, 186-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Singer, R. N., Cauraugh, J. H., Chen, D., Steinberg, G. M., & Freilich, S. G. (1996). Visual search, anticipation and reactive comparisons between highly skilled and beginning tennis players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, 9-26. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content