Studia Kinanthropologica 2018, 19(3):159-163

Effect of ideomotor intervention in the course of sensomotor learning

D. Benešová*, P. Hranáč, K. Švátora
Centrum tělesné a sportovní výchovy Fakulty pedagogické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni

The goal of our research is to assess the effect of ideomotor intervention in sensomotor learning of a movement task, which is focused on the ability of balancing with a subject. The research sample consisted of 60 persons at the age of 21-35 years (n = 60). The experimental group consisted of 30 probands (nE = 30), and the control group had 30 probands too (nK = 30). The tests were carried out in the form of pre-test and post-test, while the experimental group underwent a short relaxation and ideomotor intervention between the pre-test and post-test. To evaluate the differences between the control and experimental group, we compared the arithmetic averages of the t-test for independent files, and a correlation diagram was used to make a graphical comparison of changes in performance achieved in the pre-test and post-test. Substantive significance was verified by the Cohen's d coefficient. The results show that ideomotor intervention had an effect on sensomotor performance in the post-test. In the experimental group, the difference in the pre-test and post-test (improvement) performance is statistically and substantively higher. We believe that ideomotor intervention had a positive effect on sensomotor learning.

Keywords: ideomotor; imagination; sensorimotor learning

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Benešová D, Hranáč P, Švátora K. Effect of ideomotor intervention in the course of sensomotor learning. Studia Kinanthropologica. 2018;19(3):159-163.
Download citation

References

  1. Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavioral, 3, 111-149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Artistic gymnasts. The Sport Psychologist, 12, 387-403.
  3. Farah, M. J. (1984). The neurological basis of mental imagery: A componential analysis. Cognition, 18, 245-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Hacken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A Theoretical Model of Phase Transition in Human Hand Movements. Biol. Cyber. 51, 139-151. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Hoffmann, F. (2002). Symptomatische Therapie. In M. Schmidt & F. Hoffmann (Hrsg.), Multiple Sklerose (S. 182-236). München: Urban & Fischer.
  6. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effect across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory and Cognition, 34 (2), 356-367. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Mayer, J., & Hermann, H. D. (2014). Mentales Training : Grundlagenund Anwendung in Sport, Rehabilitation, Arbeitund Wirtschaft. Springer.
  8. Munzert, J. (2001). Bewegungsvorstellungen - Bewegungshandlungsvorstellungen. In D. Hackfort (Hrsg.). Handlungspsychologische Forschung für die Theorieund Praxis der Sport psychologie (pp. 49-63). Köln: bps.
  9. Munzert, J., Lorey, B., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representation. Brain Research Reviews, 60, 306-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Olivier, N., & Rockmann, U. (2003). Theoretische Ansätze der Sportmotorik. In N. Olivier & U. Rockmann, Grundlagen der Bewegungswissenschaft und -lehre. Schorndorf: Hofmann.
  11. Reiser, M., Büsch, D., & Munzert, J. (2011). Strength Gains by Motor Imagery with Different Ratios of Physical to Mental Practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 194. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00194. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Motor learning and performance. From principles to practice. Champaign: Human Kinetic.
  13. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL, US: Human Kinetics. Go to original source...
  14. Sigmundová, D., Sigmund, E. (2012). Statistická a věcná významnost a použití koeficientů "effectsize" při hodnocení dat o pohybové aktivitě. Tělesná kultura, 35(1), 55-72. Go to original source...
  15. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (6), 1625-1640. Go to original source...
  16. White, A. & Hardy, L. (1998). An in-depth analysis of the uses of imagery by high level slalom canoeists and artistic gymnasts. The Sport Psychologist, 12, 387-403. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.