Studia Kinanthropologica 2011, 12(2):103-107

The share of participation of the intellectual skills in the process of motor learning

P. Valach
Západočeská univerzita v Plzni, Fakulta pedagogická, Katedra tělesné a sportovní výchovy

The aim of this study was experimental verification of course of the motor learning in conditions of current physical education practices. Specifically, this was the finding of the relationship levels for acquirement of selected movement skills in gymnastics and gymnast intellective potential. The study was provided with students from the Department of Sport and Physical Education, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen. Gymnast from this research group passed training of the same acrobatic exercises from gymnastics (front flip, somersault forward, backward roll to handstand). The application of selected teaching methods had been running for two months, once a week. Gymnasts were tested by the intellective potential test - T.I.P before they acquired their selected motor skills. This is a nonverbal test of the extrapolation of abstract relations with effort to minimize the role of spatial factors, based on a large variety and diversity of perceptual tasks. According to the analysis of these acquired dates they were made conclusions about existence of some degree of dependence between the level of intellect potential and achievement levels of gymnastic skills from our research group.

Keywords: potential of intellect; T. I. P.; motor skill; sport gymnastics; fluid intelligence

Published: September 30, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Valach P. The share of participation of the intellectual skills in the process of motor learning. Studia Kinanthropologica. 2011;12(2):103-107.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Čáp, J. & Mareš, J. (2001). Psychologie pro učitele. Praha: Portál.
    2. Darwish, A. M. (1987). Analýza funkce gymnastiky v pohybové přípravě studentů herectví na vysokých školách. (Kand. disertační práce). Praha: FTVS UK.
    3. Dobrý, L. (1996). Jak zacházet s učivem aneb o didaktických metodách (2). Těl. Vých. Sport Mlád., 62, 2, 2-6.
    4. Hartl, P., & Hartlová, H. (2004). Psychologický slovník. Praha: Portál.
    5. Hendl, J. (2004). Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat. Praha: Portál.
    6. Holeček, V. & kol. (2003). Psychologie pro právníky. Dobrá Voda: Aleš Čeněk.
    7. Choutka, M., Brklová, D., & Votík, J. (1999). Motorické učení v tělovýchovné a sportovní praxi. Plzeň: ZČU.
    8. Marques, N. K. (2010). Coaching Peripheral Vision Training for Soccer Athletes. Physical educator, 67(2), 74 - 90.
    9. Měkota, K., & Cuberek, R. (2007). Pohybové dovednosti činnosti výkony. 1. vyd. Olomouc: UP.
    10. Michel, G., & Moorová, C. (1999). Psychobiologie. Praha: Portál.
    11. Pavlík, J. (2003). Tělesná stavba jako faktor výkonnosti sportovce. Brno: MU.
    12. Perez, C. R., Meira C. M., & Tani, G. (2005). Does the contextual interference effect last over extended transfer trials? Perceptual and Motor skills, 700(1), 58-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Piaget, J. (1999). Psychologie inteligence. Praha: Portál.
    14. Ruisel, I. (2000). Základy psychologie inteligence. Praha: Portál.
    15. Říčan, P. (1971). Test intelektového potenciálu (T.I.P.). Psychodiagnostické & didaktické testy, n.p. Bratislava.
    16. Schmidt, R., & Wrisberg, C. (2000). Motor learning and performance. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publisher.
    17. Slepička, P., Hošek, V., & Hátlová, B. (2009). Psychologie sportu. Praha: Karolinum.
    18. Sigmund, E. & Sigmundová, D. (2011). Pohybová aktivita pro podporu zdraví dětí a mládeže. Olomouc: UP.
    19. Véle, F. (1997). Kineziologie pro klinickou praxi. Praha: Grada Publishing.
    20. Watson, T., & Radwan, H. (2001). Comparison of three teaching methods for learning spinal manipulation skill: a pilot study. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, Vol. 9 No. 1, 48-52. Go to original source...
    21. Wilde, H., Magnuson, C., & Shea, H. CH. (2005). Random and blocked practice of movement sequences: Differential effects on response structure and movement speed. Research Quaterly for exercise and sport, 76, (4), 416-425. Go to original source...
    22. Zítko, M. (2000). Akrobacie I. Od kotoulu po přemet. VHS. Praha: ČASPV.
    23. Zipp, G. P., & Gentile, A. M. (2010). Practice Schedule and The Learning Of Motor Skills in Children and Adults: Teaching Implications. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 35 - 42. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content